NBC Censors Snowden’s Critical 9/11 Comments From Prime Time Audience
“They found that we had all of the information we needed as an intelligence community… to detect this plot”
Statements made by NSA whistleblower Edward
Snowden regarding the 9/11 terror attacks were edited out of his NBC
Nightly News interview with Brian Williams Wednesday in what appears to
be an attempt to bolster legitimacy for the agency’s controversial
surveillance programs.
Snowden’s comments surrounding the failure of
dragnet surveillance in stopping the 9/11 attacks were censored from
the prime time broadcast and instead buried in an hour long clip on
NBC’s website.
“You know this is a key question that the 9/11 commission considered, and what they found in the postmortem when they looked at all the classified intelligence from all the different intelligence agencies, they found that we had all of the information we needed as an intelligence community, as a classified sector, as the national defense of the United States, to detect this plot,” Snowden said.
“We actually had records of the phone calls from the United States
and out. The CIA knew who these guys were. The problem was not that we
weren’t collecting information, it wasn’t that we didn’t have enough
dots, it wasn’t that we didn’t have a haystack, it was that we did not
understand the haystack that we had.”
NBC’s decision to bury Snowden’s comments are unsurprising given the
fact that the 9/11 attacks are exhaustively used by the federal
government as the prime justification for surveilling millions of
innocent Americans. Snowden
remarked on the government’s prior knowledge of the accused Boston bombers as well, also cut from the prime time interview.
‘If we’re missing things like the Boston Marathon bombings where all
of these mass-surveillance systems, every domestic dragnet in the world,
didn’t reveal guys that the Russian intelligence service told us about
by name, is that really the best way to protect our country or are we
trying to throw money at a magic solution that’s actually not just
costing us our safety, but our rights and our way of life,” Snowden
said.
Despite countless government officials pointing to 9/11
foreknowledge, whether missed or ignored, establishment media outlets
have continually worked to keep such voices out of relevant reporting.
Former NSA senior executive turned whistleblower Thomas Drake, who
revealed unconstitutional surveillance programs targeting Americans in
2005, has repeatedly commented on NSA intelligence that would have
“undoubtedly” stopped the 9/11 attacks.
“The NSA had critical intelligence about Al Qaeda and associated
movements in particular that had never been properly shared outside of
NSA,” Drake said in a recent interview. “They simply did not share
critical intelligence although they had it.”
In a January letter to
President Obama, Drake and fellow whistleblowers William Binney, Edward
Loomis, and Kirk Wiebe not only detailed the agency’s foreknowledge,
but the ensuing cover-up as well.
“The sadder reality, Mr. President, is that
NSA itself had enough information to prevent 9/11, but chose to sit on
it rather than share it with the FBI or CIA. We know; we were there,”
the letter reads. “We were witness to the many bureaucratic indignities
that made NSA at least as culpable for pre-9/11 failures as are other
U.S. intelligence agencies.”
Outside of the NSA, countless intelligence
officials have also commented on 9/11 foreknowledge and the federal
government’s attempts to stifle any investigation into negligence and
wrongdoing.
Former senior intelligence officer Lt. Col
Anthony Shaffer, who attempted to inform the government after
identifying the two terrorist cells later charged for the 9/11 attacks
in 2000 during Operation Able Danger, was attacked and demonized by the
Defense Intelligence Agency after informing Congress of the agency’s
refusal to act.
“I had no intention of joining the ranks of ‘whistle blowers,’” Shaffer said in 2009.
“When I made my disclosure to the 9/11 commission regarding the
existence of a pre 9/11 offensive counter-terrorism operation that had
discovered several of the 9/11 terrorists a full year before the 9/11
attacks my intention was to simply tell the truth, and fulfill my oath
of office.”
Former FBI wiretap translator Sibel Edmonds, who had access to top-secret communications, told reporters in 2004 that the FBI had detailed 9/11 foreknowledge that specifically mentioned a terrorist attack involving airplanes.
“We should have had orange or red-type of
alert in June or July of 2001. There was that much information
available,” Edmonds told Salon. “There was specific information about
use of airplanes, that an attack was on the way two or three months
beforehand and that several people were already in the country by May of
2001. They should’ve alerted the people to the threat we’re facing.”
According to Edmonds, after the 9/11 attacks,
FBI supervisors ordered translators to “work slowly” in order to ensure
that the agency would get larger funding the next year.
The vast number of whistleblowers in the
intelligence community not only gives credence to Snowden’s comments,
but also exemplifies the NSA’s illegitimate growth since 9/11.
In a desperate attempt to gain the moral high ground, Secretary of State John Kerry claimedSnowden had
aided terrorists during an interview on “Good Morning America”
Wednesday despite having absolutely no evidence to support his
accusation.
Despite the fact that the NSA leaks have proven the agency to be involved in issues unrelated to national security, such as economic espionage,
the claim of using mass surveillance to stop terrorism deteriorates
even further in light of recent decisions by the Obama Administration.
In 2013, President Obama waived a federal law designed
to prevent the US from arming terrorists in order to provide military
support to the “Syrian rebels.” Even with Syrian Revolutionary Front
leader Jamal Maarouf admitting
that his fighters work alongside the Al-Qaeda aligned Jabhat al-Nusra,
the Obama Administration has continued its unflinching support.
The president’s support of Al-Qaeda was so
transparent during the Libyan overthrow that former Democratic
Congressman Dennis Kucinich publicly questioned why the US-backed “Libyan rebels” had placed an Al Qaeda flag over the top of the courthouse in Benghazi.
Whether it be issuing fake terror alerts, creating domestic terror plots or allowing them to take place,
the national security state will undoubtedly do whatever it can to
continue its unabated growth towards total information awareness.
The Zionist Surveillance State is here, and is only getting worse…
No comments:
Post a Comment